Mayola Sylva: They always make predictions with an "out."They've been abusing the hell out of their out.... as the complete opposite of what they've been predicting has come to pass. When they eventually admit that the earth isn't at a "record warm year." Or they finally become honest and readjust their temperature adjustments so they reflect reality then there will be silence out of this crowd for a while....Show more
Tomeka Hameen: I'm willing to go to war against my fellow "lungers"...especially the ones who wish to use this natural climate cycle to strip me and my family of our liberty and freedoms.
Pasty Cobbett: Let me ask you why you feel it is necessary to tell so many lies and to constantly distort reality.Please provide credible links to sources that back up your claims. If you’re unable to do so then the obvious conclusion is that, not having come from any other source, then it must have come from you.You rightly berate a person if they claim tha! t a spell of hot weather in such and such a place is evidence of global warming yet hypocritically, you relentlessly bang on about how three weeks of cold weather in the UK is proof that there’s no such thing as global warming. Where’s the integrity or rationality in that?I wouldn’t even like to estimate the number of times that people have explained the difference between weather and climate to you, it is easily into triple digits. You’re able to make the distinction but only when it suits you.I know exactly what it is you’re referring to in your question. It’s comments made by Dr David Viner of the Climatic Research Unit in the UK that he made in 2000. At the time he stated (paraphrasing) that snow would become a rare occurrence, children could grow up not knowing what snow is and that harsh winters would return from time to time and catch everybody out.Whether you wish to accept it or not, the simple fact of the matter is that he was correct. Compared wi! th 50 years ago the UK now receives 78% less snow than it did,! up until last year there were parts of the UK that hadn’t seen any real snow for more than 30 years and since the severe winter of 1962/3 there have only been four bad winters.Here’s the original article that your claims originate from: http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/snowfalls... Unfortunately for the deniers and skeptics there is mounting evidence that the cold winters are a direct consequence of global warming. Nothing to do with the Gulf Stream being disrupted which is a claim some people make but, more to do with a reversal of weather conditions in the Arctic.This event, known as an Arctic Dipole Anomaly, is a new weather phenomenon but is one that has long been predicted as a consequence of global warming. It first manifested itself in 2001 and has occurred four times since then. Ordinarily high pressure over Siberia feeds into low pressure areas over northern Canada but this has been switching. The result is that weather patterns, winds, ice-floes a! nd ocean currents begin to move in the opposite direction.If you look at this graph of Arctic sea-ice extent earlier this year you can see that in the weeks up to the end of June there was very rapid shrinkage of the ice but then on 29th June the reduction in extent dramatically slowed down. This was the date the anomaly started. If you look at the inset you can see that ordinarily the pattern of ice extent follows a fairly smooth curve but this year (the red line) the curve was replaced by a series of steps.http://www.flickr.com/photos/trevorandclaire/49953... These steps depict when there was almost no reduction in sea-ice extent followed by a very rapid reduction, something that repeated several times as the Arctic weather patterns oscillated.Not enough is known about the Arctic Oscillation to say for certain if it is a consequence of global warming or what the future consequences are likely to be. It will require several more years of research and observations before! any meaningful conclusions can be drawn.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A! rctic_dipole_anomaly Incidentally, I didn’t predict the freezing weather in the UK. The only prediction I made was three months back when I said I thought it “highly unlikely that this winter will be worse than the one last yearâ€. Although technically correct in that we’ve only had three weeks of bad weather, I didn’t expect this winter to be as cold or as snowy as it has been so far.http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=201009... - - - - - - - - EDIT: TO GEORGE ORWELL.Shall I pass a ladder down into the hole you’ve just fallen into? You claim “They won't admit that stories like this were ever printed†and linked to the article in the Independent. Shame that I’d already linked to it BEFORE you answered the question.You then state “Good thing we have the internet to keep catching the AGW crowd in there liesâ€. Yes it is a good thing we have the internet to keep catching YOU out in YOUR lies....Show more
Clement Viscarro: You should watch! a documentary called "The Great Global Warming Swindle"Schools hammering it into your head and now you have to make a history project on it? HISTORY?! Shouldn't history be about great wars past and such, not about current bullcrap?
Margy Sandquist: They also predicted that it would begin to get dark toward nighttime giving way to lighter skies as dawn approaches, and that if the wind blows it will be windy as well as if it rains there is a chance one may get wet if they venture outside without a "chubby" or umbrella.
Codi Manchel: You clearly show a lack of knowledge in global warming.The climate isn't getting colder - world global temperature has been on a steady upward trend for decades.Just note that it's a world global average - a spell of unusually cold weather in a region isn't "proof" of global warming being false any more than a spell of unusually warm weather in the same region is proof that it's true....Show more
Valentine Michaud: its wheneve! r i walk into a roomman, it gets so hot in there
Patrick Bitsui: ! -walk, ride or bike-car pool-use canvas instead of plastic-recycle, reduce, reuse-plant a tree
Georgina Natal: carbon crap keeps the heat inside the earthit was stored away...now we burn it for energy.go to a com ed factory, it's a pretty sight *sarcasm
Rebeca Mckin: They did predict it, at least one of them. That is the beauty of their religion, they predict everything. Take their overall prediction of "climate change". When in the 4.5 billion year history of the Earth has the climate not changed? It is always in a state of change. Using future change as evidence for your theory is not science, it is just the same tricks used by palm readers. They have predicted earthquakes, tsunamis, floods, droughts, more hurricanes, less hurricanes, male pattern baldness, tornadoes, colder weather, hotter weather, rain, snow, sleet, clear skies, etc. etc. etc. Heck their main spokesperson even invented the internet. They tend to use the shotgun approach for predictions. ! I normally do not mind this, and if some sucker wants to pay to get their palms read, more power to them. Unfortunately, I do not want to pay $3000 a year because the govt is falling for the tricks of palm-readers. Oh we have modeled that the temps will go up anywhere from nearly 0 to 7.1 degrees celsius in the next 100 years. Thats just great, it covers about 50% of the possible outcomes, and if they are wrong, they will already be dead, so no one will be able to call them out on their idiot claims. Then these psuedo-scientists back this non-prediction with a lot of smart sounding words to confuse the masses. Whats worse is the AGW mouthpeices who take the 7.1 degree predictions and pretend like the scientists are claiming certainty on these predicitons and that the world is going to end. As far as the religious aspect, they use the same sermons that the ultra-religious use. You are going to a very hot place if you do not change your wasteful and greedy ways. All they! do is trade God for Gaia!...Show more
Somer Distilo: True. Sever! al different theories have been presented to explain the observed warming. However, not all theories are created equal. And a careful and objective analysis of the evidence supporting each one will certainly strip away all the weak and untenable ones. That's what the scientific method is for, after all.
Shemeka Laker: >>That says more about the quality of the education in your area than about the science itself.>>Don't blame the scientists. How about you blame the media? For it is the media who are eager to cherry-pick a scientific paper and convert a scientific observation regarding a global decrease in snow episodes into a "It Will Never Snow Again" headline. Heck, there are still news-papers and TV networks who do not know the difference between weather and climate. >>But they did say it all along. For your information, Global Warming does not mean that locally it will never snow nor freeze again. What Global Warming does contribute to is the amount of vapour in th! e air, vapour which ultimately turns into rain or snow, depending upon the specific weather conditions in your area. Before blaming the AGW camp, you would do well in educating yourself a bit beyond what the mainstream media tells you. When 93% of world's leading climatologists say Global Warming is happening yet you and many others are still skeptic, then surely the media are doing a terrible job.TO RICHIE:>>Hey Richie: How about you show us, with a credible link, the percentage of global climatologists who do not support AGW? Perhaps the Royal Society knows. If not, I am sure you are able to mis-comprehend yet again one of their quotes and copy-and-paste it here to back of your delusional arguments....Show more
Malissa Porth: Were they just kidding us on when they said snow would be a rare occurrence, etc? Everybody knows they have been promoting global warming in these regions for decades even teaching children in school that they will never see snow at home again ! or only once in a lifetime... Well these children have seen tons of sno! w for three years in a row. They might fool the politicians but will never fool the kids as the future generation are witnessing these lies for themselves and many of them feel really cheated!Is this the tactic from the AGW camp to never admit they are wrong and instead just make something up about how they predicted the cold weather all along? Surely this tactic is just not going to wash and will make them look worse. Wouldn't it be much better for them to just hold their hands up and say they were wrong with this one and move on? The Royal Society do say that there understanding of Climate Change could significantly change so why don't most of their religious followers agree?...Show more
Ermelinda Stalnaker: The Earth has NORMAL cycles of cooling and warming. Man has NOTHING to do with it!
Monica Voltin: Global climate change theory predicts the following scenario (and always has):Overall increase in global average temperatures result in melting of vast amoun! ts of fresh water trapped on top of Greenland which flows into the North Atlantic. This addition of fresh water changes the ocean salinity to the point where natural currents like the Gulf Stream which provides warming to Great Britain and Western Europe stops flowing thus causing significant cooling in that area especially in the winter months.Attempting to discredit a well thought out and researched theory without doing even the most basic research on it yourself makes you look like a fool who can't do anything but regurgitate unfounded mis-information.EDIT:You prove my point. Just because you never bothered to actually find out all of the ramifications of global climate change doens't mean the information was not available to all. Your opinion is based on cherry picked bits of the theory reported by non-scientific media hacks spoon fed to you in an obviously successful attempt to keep the oil and coal industries in business for as long as possible despite the dangers ! involved....Show more
Luke Gacusan: Just once, Mr. Jello, I'd lik! e to see you cite real peer-reviewed science instead of news reports and political advocacy sites. Here's how to cite real science: First, you point out that the cosmic-ray hypothesis has been refuted; then you link to the peer-reviewed article that refutes it:http://www.pubs.royalsoc.ac.uk/media/proceedings_a...Here's another example: First you point out that the solar activity hypothesis has been refuted; then you link to the peer-reviewed article that refutes it:http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/mpa/publications/pr...If you began to rely on real science like that, you'd have a lot more respect from everyone.Meanwhile, I'd just like to point out that no hypothesis other than the greenhouse hypothesis can explain the following data:1. Increased stratospheric cooling:http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/temp/sterin/sterin.ht...2. Decreased diurnal temperature variation:http://www.bom.gov.au/bmrc/clfor/cfstaff/jma/2004G...http://ams.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-ab...So when we ! have one hypothesis that CAN explain the data and hasn't been refuted, up against two other hypotheses that CANNOT explain the data and have been refuted, which is the best hypothesis? Which hypothesis deserves our support, and has earned it?...Show more
Marielle Hedeiros: global warming is bs.
Jonie Lauria: Global warming is when the average temeture of the earth increases. it is caused by such sections of our atmosphere like th ozen being depleated by other gasses. this lets more radiation from the sun enter into earth. it also makes it so that the gasses that replace the ozen make the atmosphere thicker, so that reflected radiation can not escape as easily, so it stays on earth, heating thins up. but there are so many factors. it is hard to know for sure. it is very much a dominoe effect, climate chang, caps melt, then the whole climate equilibreum changes. u asked about green house gasses. well its simple. its annoying the only answer is just 'take the bus, ! ride bikes, carpool, walk,drive a hybrid, etc.' these end up as anoying! sayings everybody says. but if hey werent very true, they wouldnt be this famous. so theese simple steps really are the best thing to do....Show more
Elden Bardach: an increase of the earth's temperature by a few degrees resulting in an increase in the volume of water which contributes to sea-level rise
Madie Strople: Mr. Jello, I'm gratified to be removed from your blocked list.I'd like to just point out that there are a lot of "forcings" or individual drivers, of the temperature of the Earth, and the actual temperature of the Earth is a combination of them all. So there's no single cause.As to the size of the CO2 forcing term---that's well established by laboratory measurement of the electromagnetic spectrum of CO2, followed by calculation of its effect on radiative transfer in the Earth's atmosphere. There's really very little doubt or room for error about that.I entirely agree that prediction of the future of Earth's atmosphere are uncertain, but mostly b! ecause we do not understand natural sources and sinks of greenhouse gasses....Show more
Bob Pucella: One of the favorite dodges of the deniers is "Prove it!"
Abby Herwood: Sweetie, why should we think that it would be good to attempt to stop Global Warming? It might be bad to do such a thing. Just think what temperature the earth might be if past generations had tried to cool the planet. A similar increase in temperature (half a degree) occurred from 1910 to 1940. During the next forty years, there was concern that the earth was going into an ice age. There is no real evidence humans have any affect on the temperature of the earth. Climate changes are part of nature, and humans are part of nature, too. However, it would be great if everybody would moderate their consumption and provide assistance to hungry people.
Todd Stogner: the main greenhouse gasses.methane, ozone, nitrogen oxides (N2O NO NO2), water, CFCs and HFCs.greenhouse gasses lower the a! mount of heat escaping into space. this is called the greenhouse effect! . the greenhouse effect keeps the earth a good 20 degrees warmer then it would be without greenhouse gasses.more greenhouse gasses cause the earth to warm by enhancing the greenhouse effect. this prevents more heat from escapeing from the earth and so the earth will warm.===========some of the effects of global warming will be increased temperatures, this will also cause many other problems such as water shortages desertification and damage to ecosystems.===========by conserving energy and by pressuring governments to move towards renewable energy....Show more
Leora Klingelhoets: Right Robert. Science should be a vote of the consensus. No one should be burdened to prove science, that's just a waste of time and money.Objectiveness just gets in the way of progress, right?
Donte Schoenhals: for decades, environmentalism has been the Left's maximum perfect excuse for increasing authorities administration over our moves in options both large and small. that's for ! mom Earth! that's for the youngsters! that's for the whales! yet before, the doomsday-scenario environmental scares they have trumped up have not been large sufficient to provide the sinister prize they favor maximum of all: entire administration of yankee politics, economic pastime, or perhaps man or woman habit. With international warming, even if, greenhouse gasbags can argue that automobile emissions in Ohio threaten human beings in Paris, and that truly international authorities can address such issues. nationwide sovereignty? Democracy? ignore it: international warming has now extra the Left in route of international authorities, statism, and the eradication of man or woman rights than it has ever been before.
Keneth Mailhot: I don't have anything to contribute b/c I think "global warming" is a crock of BS. It's something they're doing to control us, pretty soon there will be all kinds of things legislated that we HAVE to do to "save the planet", or we'll be in! violation and thrown in jail or something. And the fact that you ha! ve to do a project in school about it is further proof...they're brainwashing your generation.
Eleni Mccier: Heat,radiation ultraviolet rays come from the sun. With a thick O-zone layer most of these rays get filtered out. We are protected from these harmful rays by the ozone layer. Ozone (O3) can be broken down by various chemicals including carbon emissions, Aerosal sprays in other words greenouse gases. We are essentially breaking down parts of our protective layer. This allows these harmful rays to enter earths atmosphere and remain on the planet. A Greenhouse is a glass house that plants are grown in. Essentially the way it works is the suns rays enter through the glass and can't escape so they remain in the greenhouse. This causes the greenhouse to become a warm and moist environment.There is evidence that the earth is warmer now than it was a few hundred years ago. There is also evidence that the polar ice caps are melting. There is even evidence that! there is a hole in the Ozone layer above one of the poles. It is very controversial whether Greenhouse gases are causing the global warming. The 2-3 degree rise in temperature could be completely natural. The dinosaurs lived in a temperature much warmer than it is now. We have only been around for a few thousand years. Dinosaurs lasted for millions of years. So the ozone layer may not be the reason for the warming. Warming may have occured even if there were no humans on the earth. As of right now there is no way for us to restore the Ozone layer. However it is restoring itself naturally. We can reduce the amount of emmissions and encourage the growth of plants to absorb the gases. This may allow the ozone to repair itself, but it may not affect global warming....Show more
Jamika Gregorio: Hey Gringo: wow now only 93% of climatologists support AGW now well that number is reducing by the week!
Joel Feagler: Hi Debbie: Here is an very well written arti! cle to help you understand how and why global warming has a religious f! ollowing http://www.numberwatch.co.uk/religion.htm
Lu Tiner: Global warming is a way that the UN will try to tax the rich and give to the not haves! Even though we give billions more than the rest of the world we will be suckered in giving up more because the dooms day freaks keep coming up with more reasons to take away from us! Water vapor causes the earth to heat and to cool! This gas makes up 95% of all gases in the atmosphere! C02 make up 3.618% of the gases. 3.2% of this C02 gas is what man has contributed the rest is Natural. We have heard all the stories before the CFC's destroying the ozone, Acid rain, global cooling, overpopulation! All of these were a " sky is falling" issue that never ammounted to anything.There is a hole in the atmosphere!! Scientist have been watching it for years! However this hole has been opening and closing by its self!!! What does this mean? does it mean that gasses are exscaping??...Show more
Hyo Hardell: Global warming is t! he rise in temperature of the earth's atmosphere.It's said that by the time a baby born today is 80 years old, the world will be 6 and a half degrees warmer than it is now.
Charline Granes: I would answer, but I think Cosmo and Keith pretty well owned you on this one. There is nothing left to add, and even if there was, it would be poor sportsmanship.
Edwina Fu: There are so many different theories to why the planet is warming, all you have to do is choose one. How can you be wrong?If you feel more comfortable following others, you believe CO2 created by man is the problem. There's certainly enough material that will support what you believe.Maybe you wish to believe that Cosmic Rays are the cause. You can find proof to back up you position so you know you're right as well.http://www.cgfi.org/materials/articles/2003/aug_22...Think it's sunspots? There's a couple of Russian Scientist who are putting $10,000 dollars of their own money down for you to prove them! wrong. Piece of cake, man is at fault, right? Any takers? I doubt i! t. Safety in numbers, not actions.http://worldofwonder.net/archives/2005/Aug/19/taki...http://www.livescience.com/environment/070312_sola...There's as many theories as scientist. Which one is right? To bad no one will provide proof....Show more
Jacques Vaquera: Global Warming is another invention of Komrade Al "I invented the internet as well as global warming" Gore.Maybe Komrade Gore could sell his jet, his fleet of SUV's and his HUGE energy sucking homes.... what a hypocrite!Komrade Gore spent $30,000 for energy just for his Nashville home in 2006. He has another 10,000 square foot home as well as a third one.http://www.usatoday.com/news/opinion/editorials/20......Show more
Felicitas Phildor: There are ways to prevent global warming from getting worse. Recycle, car pool, use cars that use ethanol, and stop polluting. There are many ways to prevent and try to stop it. It would take alot of years to stop global warming and repair the ozone layer.
Giov! anna Sherlin: Its for a history project, i have to make a website about global warming... feel free to check it outwww.freewebs.com/loveexliddits not finished yet... not even close but it'll be done by June.. thanks [:
Filiberto Ranalli: i understand there are varied scientists who're obtainable who say this is genuine. I additionally understand that there are much extra politicians and journalists who gets extra acceptance, skill, and money in the event that they say this is a shown actuality. i understand Galileo became into stated as a denier and insane whilst he suggested the earth isn't the middle of the universe. i understand extremely everyone knew the international became into flat one thousand years in the past. I additionally understand that the nationwide Geographic magazine revealed a piece of writing stated as "Ice on the international", the object suggested a brilliant form of the glaciers have been increasing. the object suggested we've been plunging in! to yet another ice age. i understand human beings have appeared at clim! ate graphs and function suggested international warming has been happening for extra or less sixty years. That isn't smart. or possibly i'm purely a stupid denier and don't understand approximately such issues....Show more
Jene Licausi: Hey "lunatic" (appropriate name by the way)- Then why did a senior researcher at CRU not hear of this theory? Strange, isn't it?Snowfalls are now just a thing of the pastAccording to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become "a very rare and exciting event"....Show more
Arlene Maycumber: i dont think global warming is real, i used to, but my dad is friends with a meteorologist (a really good weather man), and he said global warming is a natural thing that happens and eventually the temperature will go back down.
Tatiana Evanosky: Adherents to the AGW religious philosophy, that is those who put their faith in! the AGW creed as espoused by many on this site, are not as interested in the climate as they pretend, their real agenda is to effect social change, with an emphasis on the equalization of income among all the population of the earth, the strict implementation of population control, and the elevation of the "scientist" to the become the new ruling class in the new world order. The fallacy of anthropogenic global warming is simply an instrument to effect these changes. They will defend it up to the point of obvious failure, then they will abandon it for another "cause celebre' in order to accomplish the same goal. Failure of the AGW creed is coming sooner than they thought....Show more
Shane Getler: Generally, it's an increase in the average planetary atmospheric temperatures. Some deny that it's taking place at all...http://www.stuffintheair.com/global-warming-ha.htm...Others debate over the cause, such as greenhouse gases, whose production is a function of energy! consumption. You, as a consumer, can reduce your "environmental footp! rint" by reducing the energy you cause to be consumed (through the things you buy, the way you get to work etc.)...Show more
Aron Ramu: because they didn't.... that's from the bp oil spill slowing down the gulf stream so just keep drilling god will protect us
Shad Bushweller: We have no real proof. THe Earth could be going through a different phase right now.
Violette Vanek: There is no such thing as global warming. Genesis 8:22 refutes that.
Amada Greising: Until we figure out how to control the sun there is nothing that humans can do about global warming except get used to it.
Judie Kise: a THEORY that human consummation of carbon dioxide is directly related to the warming trend over the time after the industrial revolution; it disregards any 100,000 year trend theories.
Arlen Decorte: global warming are caused by population. For example when people drive cars our gas comes out air that will be sucked up to the sky and when the sun radi! ation hits it, it causes to trap it. when this happens the earth starts to get warm and it can cause floods from the melting of the poles making the water to rise. Greenhouses work by trapping heat from the sun. The glass panels of the greenhouse let in light but keep heat from escaping. This causes the greenhouse to heat up, much like the inside of a car parked in sunlight, and keeps the plants warm enough to live in the winter.The Earth’s atmosphere is all around us. It is the air that we breathe. Greenhouse gases in the atmosphere behave much like the glass panes in a greenhouse. Sunlight enters the Earth's atmosphere, passing through the blanket of greenhouse gases. As it reaches the Earth's surface, land, water, and biosphere absorb the sunlight’s energy. Once absorbed, this energy is sent back into the atmosphere. Some of the energy passes back into space, but much of it remains trapped in the atmosphere by the greenhouse gases, causing our world to heat up. If we! keep this up earth would be nothing but water....Show more
Patti! e Vold: the GW scientists use every excuse to claim GW is happening.hot day cold dayexcessive rainlack of rainel ninono el ninono snow excessive snowall caused by global warming.no matter what happens, your covered.if you think were going into an ice age 30 years ago, that was really caused by global warming....Show more
Jacques Teri: Lunatic: Why was your theory never taught to the children or publicised? Why were they only ever told to expect mild winters and that snow would be a once in a lifetime occurrence? It seems very strange that you should promote this strange theory now after the record breaking snow.... very strange! My point is that I really doubt anybody is going to believe the alarmist propaganda again as they were all told to expect warm mild winters!Somebody's got to just stick their hands up and say whoops that was a doo doo so we can move on!...Show more
